Current:Home > ScamsSpecial counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case -Insightful Finance Hub
Special counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case
View
Date:2025-04-13 09:06:23
Washington — Special counsel Jack Smith filed a blistering motion in response to former President Donald Trump's request that the judge overseeing his federal 2020 election interference criminal case recuse herself.
"There is no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, to disqualify herself in this proceeding," Smith wrote in a 20-page filing an hour before a deadline set by Chutkan to respond.
- Trump's 4 indictments in detail: A quick-look guide to charges, trial dates and key players for each case
He said that in seeking Chutkan's recusal, Trump "both takes out of context the Court's words from prior judicial proceedings and misstates the proper legal standards governing judicial recusals."
Smith also argued that Trump "cherry-picks" from two of Chutkan's sentencing hearings for two Capitol riot defendants, and in both cases, "the Court was appropriately responding to—and ultimately rejecting— a common argument raised by scores of January 6 offenders: that they deserved leniency because their actions were inspired by, or were not as serious as, those of others who contributed to the riot but had not been held responsible—including former president Donald J. Trump, the defendant in this case."
Trump's lawyers asked in a filing Monday that Chutkan remove herself from the case because of previous statements she had made in two separate Capitol riot sentencing hearings.
"Judge Chutkan has, in connection with other cases, suggested that President Trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned," Trump's lawyers wrote in their request. "Such statements, made before this case began and without due process, are inherently disqualifying."
They highlighted statements she made about the former president, including telling one Capitol riot defendant in October 2022 that the violent attempt to overthrow the government came from "blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day."
"The public meaning of this statement is inescapable — President Trump is free, but should not be," Trump's attorneys wrote.
But in his filing, Smith provided more extensive transcripts of the remarks Judge Chutkan had made in the two Capitol riot sentencing hearings to make the argument that the full transcripts show that she "did not state that [Trump] was legally or morally culpable for the events of January 6 or that he deserved punishment," but rather, that "the Court was engaged in its judicial responsibility to hear, acknowledge, and respond to [the Jan. 6 defendant's] sentencing allocution."
Addressing the emphasis placed by Trump's recusal motion on this phrase, "it's a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day," Smith wrote, "From this simple statement of uncontroverted fact, the defendant purports to draw the 'inescapable' message that the Court believes that defendant Trump should be imprisoned. But the only inescapable thing about the Court's comment is that it stated an uncontested and accurate fact in response to a mitigation argument that the Court had heard many times before."
Smith argued Trump has not proven Chutkan made biased claims because he "must show that they display a deep-seated animosity toward him."
"The defendant cannot meet this heavy burden," Smith wrote.
"Because the defendant cannot point to any statements expressing actual bias, all he can say—and he says it repeatedly—is that the Court's comments 'suggest' some sort of bias or prejudice toward the defendant," Smith added.
Ultimately, it is up to Chutkan to decide whether her past statements create the perception of bias. A new judge would be assigned to the case if she recuses. Trump's attorneys could petition an appeals court to require her to recuse, but such efforts are often not successful.
Trump will be able to respond to Smith's counter-argument, and his deadline to do so is next week.
Fin Gomez and Graham Kates contributed to this report.
- In:
- Donald Trump
- United States Department of Justice
- Jack Smith
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital. Reach her at caitlin.yilek@cbsinteractive.com. Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hausofcait
TwitterveryGood! (81872)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Woman falls to her death from 140-foot cliff in Arizona while hiking with husband and 1-year-old child
- Man granted parole for his role in the 2001 stabbing deaths of 2 Dartmouth College professors
- Blake Shelton and Gwen Stefani’s Surprise Performance Is the Sweet Escape You Need Right Now
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Shapiro says Pennsylvania will move all school standardized testing online in 2026
- Michael Busch 'doing damage' for Chicago Cubs after being boxed out by superstars in LA
- 'Fortnight' with Post Malone is lead single, video off Taylor Swift's 'Tortured Poets'
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- California shooting that left 4 dead and earlier killing of 2 cousins are linked, investigators say
Ranking
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Liquor sales in movie theaters, to-go sales of cocktails included in New York budget agreement
- Georgia beach town, Tybee Island, trying to curb Orange Crush, large annual gathering of Black college students
- Prince William Shares Promise About Kate Middleton Amid Cancer Diagnosis
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Tech has rewired our kids' brains, a new book says. Can we undo the damage?
- Arkansas Supreme Court says new DNA testing can be sought in ‘West Memphis 3' case
- Maryland teen charged with planning school shooting after police review writings, internet searches
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Travis Kelce’s Ex Kayla Nicole Responds to “Constant Vitriol”
12 students and teacher killed at Columbine to be remembered at 25th anniversary vigil
Antisemitism is everywhere. We tracked it across all 50 states.
Sam Taylor
Here's how much Caitlin Clark will make in the WNBA
Woman falls to her death from 140-foot cliff in Arizona while hiking with husband and 1-year-old child
Pennsylvania House Dems propose new expulsion rules after remote voting by lawmaker facing a warrant