Current:Home > NewsJudge blocks most of an Iowa law banning some school library books and discussion of LGBTQ+ issues -Insightful Finance Hub
Judge blocks most of an Iowa law banning some school library books and discussion of LGBTQ+ issues
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:04:43
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked key parts of an Iowa law that bans some books from school libraries and forbids teachers from raising LGBTQ+ issues.
Judge Stephen Locher’s preliminary injunction halts enforcement of the law, which was set to take effect Jan. 1 but already had resulted in the removal of hundreds of books from Iowa schools.
The law, which the Republican-led Legislature and GOP Gov. Kim Reynolds approved early in 2023, bans books depicting sex acts from school libraries and classrooms and forbids teachers from raising gender identity and sexual orientation issues with students through the sixth grade.
Locher blocked enforcement of those two provisions.
He said the ban on books is “incredibly broad” and has resulted in the removal of history volumes, classics, award-winning novels and “even books designed to help students avoid being victimized by sexual assault.” He said that part of the law is unlikely to satisfy the constitution’s requirements for free speech.
In barring the provision barring any discussion of “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” in elementary school, Locher said the way it was written it was “wildly overbroad.”
The judge let stand a requirement that school administrators notify parents if their child asks to change their pronouns or names, saying the plaintiffs did not have standing.
Iowa’s measure is part of a wave of similar legislation across the country. Typically backed by Republican lawmakers, the laws seek to prohibit discussion of gender and sexual orientation issues, ban treatments such as puberty blockers for transgender children, and restrict the use of restrooms in schools. Many have prompted court challenges.
Opponents of the Iowa law filed two lawsuits. One is on behalf of the organization Iowa Safe Schools and seven students, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and Lambda Legal. The other is by the Iowa State Education Association, publisher Penguin Random House and four authors.
The first lawsuit argues the measure is unconstitutional because it violates students’ and teachers’ free speech and equal protection rights. The second suit, which focused more narrowly on the book bans, argues the law violates the first and 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.
Lawyers for both lawsuits said the law is broad and confusing.
At a Dec. 22 hearing, Daniel Johnston with the Iowa attorney general’s office argued that school officials were applying the book ban too broadly. When deciding whether to remove books, educators shouldn’t focus on the idea of a sex act but instead look for text or images that meet Iowa’s definition of a sex act, Johnston said.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Several States Using Little-Known Fund to Jump-Start the Clean Economy
- ‘Essential’ but Unprotected, Farmworkers Live in Fear of Covid-19 but Keep Working
- A rehab center revives traumatized Ukrainian troops before their return to battle
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- What's closed and what's open on Juneteenth 2023
- Opioids are devastating Cherokee families. The tribe has a $100 million plan to heal
- Sickle cell patient's success with gene editing raises hopes and questions
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Bear kills Arizona man in highly uncommon attack
Ranking
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Some Mexican pharmacies sell pills laced with deadly fentanyl to U.S. travelers
- On Father's Day Jim Gaffigan ponders the peculiar lives of childless men
- This Week in Clean Economy: Chu Warns Solyndra Critics of China’s Solar Rise
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Coasts Should Plan for 6.5 Feet Sea Level Rise by 2100 as Precaution, Experts Say
- Ignoring Scientists’ Advice, Trump’s EPA Rejects Stricter Air Quality Standard
- Why Bre Tiesi Was Finally Ready to Join Selling Sunset After Having a Baby With Nick Cannon
Recommendation
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Medicaid renewals are starting. Those who don't reenroll could get kicked off
Kourtney Kardashian announces pregnancy with sign at husband Travis Barker's concert
'Live free and die?' The sad state of U.S. life expectancy
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Jessie J Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby Boy Over One Year After Miscarriage
How to show up for teens when big emotions arise
Bear kills Arizona man in highly uncommon attack